Telecommunications Infrastructure Archives - Page 3 of 46

Very little is written about Huawei’s optical DWDM technology, but that doesn’t mean the company hasn’t made some big waves in the industry. We had the chance to sit down with the Huawei optical team, led by Gavin Gu, at MWC 2026 to learn about their latest coherent DWDM technology. This is what we learned.

Huawei has started shipping its next-generation high-performance coherent DSP in the first quarter of 2026 as an embedded assembly in a muxponder with two ports of 2.0 Tbps coherent wavelengths. The client ports in the module include a mix of 100 Gbps, 400 Gbps, and 800 Gbps. These muxponders are housed in the company’s DWDM systems, namely the OSN 9800 K12 and K36. And of course, Huawei’s new module delivers wavelengths across the entire Super C-band and Super L-band, which is increasingly important as wavelength channels get wider.

As is the situation in the industry, the highest wavelength speed used to identify the coherent technology is just that, the highest speed capable. One of the benefits of modern coherent line cards is that the symbol rate and modulation can be adjusted to deliver different wavelength speeds and performance. Huawei presented a few of those options in a chart (Figure 1) showing the unregenerated signal distance at different wavelength speeds. Maybe the most important speeds to look at are the 2.0 Tbps and 800 Gbps. We say this because the maximum distance at 2.0 Tbps gives us a good sense of the technology, and the maximum distance at 800 Gbps tells us if the muxponder will meet current customer requirements for unregenerated span lengths when they upgrade networks to 800 Gbps over the next few years.

How does Huawei’s new coherent wavelength technology compare to the rest of the industry? We did a simple comparison between the industry and Huawei (Figure 2). Specifically, we looked at high-performance coherent muxponders that are generally available as of 1Q 2026. Of course, this doesn’t give a deep assessment of Huawei’s technology or even that of the industry. But at a high level, we think it gives a good sense of where the company is at.

Two key differences show up in this comparison. The first is that Huawei DSP uses a larger semiconductor process node, while the industry is at 3 nanometers (nm). This difference puts Huawei at a slight disadvantage at the ASIC level, but the company can still deliver 2.0 Tbps at 80 km, which was proven in a live demonstration. Usually, a DSP using a larger process node would also consume more power. However, in Huawei’s newest muxponder, power consumption is lower at 0.1 Watts/Gbps, compared to the industry average of 0.125 Watts/Gbps. We believe this power advantage is created by Huawei’s extensive in-house development of every component inside a coherent optical module (tunable laser, receiver, TIA, driver, modulator, and DSP), along with its expertise in photonic packaging and manufacturing processes (Huawei has its own state-of-the-art manufacturing, assembly, and test facility for optical modules that we once visited).

Also, using an advanced InP-based modulator with a distributed electrode, internally designed and developed to achieve 30% lower parasitic capacitance, could give the company a power-consumption advantage at the module level, compensating for the DSP’s higher power consumption. Then, at the system level, Huawei also internally develops and manufactures the major components of its optical line systems, including its pump lasers and WSS modules, giving the company greater control over technology performance and time-to-market. As a result, Huawei is constantly innovating its optical system design, from the chip level to the system level.

The 2 Tbps technology is now ready, with the first wave of deployments underway. During MWC 2026, Huawei highlighted six successful trials of its 2 Tbps-capable muxponders across Europe, Asia Pacific, the Middle East, and Latin America for different applications, including terrestrial backbone, data center interconnect (DCI), and submarine. In an effort to address the rising demand for submarine network capacity, Huawei has also launched a muxponder specifically for this application, as demonstrated in one of its trials, which achieved 28 Tbps in a single fiber of undersea cable. In addition, the company proudly announced that the first commercial deployment with a major European Tier-1 communication service provider (CSP) is currently in progress.

In a far-reaching ruling this week, the FCC added all consumer-grade routers produced in foreign countries to its existing Covered List–effectively blocking any new foreign-made router model from receiving FCC equipment authorization. Without FCC authorization, no new foreign-made routers can be imported or sold into the US market. Nearly 100% of consumer-grade routers are manufactured or assembled outside the United States, which means the FCC has significantly limits on new router imports and sales until approvals or waivers are granted.

Previously authorized devices are not affected and can continue to be imported, sold, and used. Firmware support for these models is expected to continue through at least March 1, 2027, with a possible extension.

For broadband providers, existing CPE deployment and inventory remain in place. However, the policy introduces uncertainty around the timing and availability of next-generation equipment.

Cybersecurity Concerns Could Hurt Broadband Providers

In its decision, the FCC cited cybersecurity concerns that foreign-made routers were implicated in the Volt, Flax, and Salt Typhoon targeting vital U.S. infrastructure. All of those were serious and very concerted efforts at cyber espionage, and all have been tied back to China. The consumer routers that were targeted in each of these attacks were from multiple brands, including Cisco, D-Link, Netgear, Asus, and others, all of which generally split manufacturing and assembly between Taiwan, the Philippines, Malaysia, and Vietnam, among others. Some of these companies even have US-based corporate headquarters or major US sales offices. But for the FCC, the focus of its decision is not on the corporate nationality, but on the country of production.

For broadband operators, the implications could be meaningful. Many ISP-supplied gateways and mesh systems are assembled by global original design manufacturers (ODMs), including Sercomm, Arcadyan, Askey, Compal, and Wistron NeWeb. There is currently not enough domestic manufacturing capacity of residential CPE and routers to fill in the supply gap ISPs now face, since the vast majority are manufactured in other countries.

Cable operators running managed Wi-Fi programs—such as Comcast’s xFi, Charter’s Spectrum Wi-Fi—are particularly exposed, since those programs depend on a steady pipeline of certified gateway hardware to provision new subscribers and replace aging CPE in the field. A freeze on new model authorizations could not only limit the availability of new DOCSIS 4.0 and Wi-Fi 7 units, but also the limit the new revenue associated with the managed Wi-Fi services these operators are providing.

The FCC established a Conditional Approval pathway, which may require disclosure of management structure, supply chain details, and potential plan for to US manufacturing. However, there is no published timeline for how long that process takes, and no precedent for how many applications the relevant agencies can process in parallel.

Few, if any, brands known for consumer-grade routers currently build products stateside. Standing up domestic manufacturing lines—even for final assembly—is a capital-intensive, multi-year undertaking. Beyond the amount of time, it would take to get domestic manufacturing up and running is the cost to do so. CPE margins are incredibly slim to begin with, which makes it almost impossible that these companies would even consider onshoring manufacturing, where input costs are significantly higher than in Southeast Asia.

In the near term, the US residential router market will now stratify in ways that may not serve the underlying security objectives. Inventory of previously-authorized models will be rationed, prices will rise, and innovation cycles — particularly the transition to Wi-Fi 7 and Wi-Fi 8 — will slow in the U.S. market relative to the rest of the world. Whether that outcome makes American networks more secure, or simply more expensive, is an open question.

AI RAN is moving to the center court. While operators have not fundamentally changed how they think about their RAN roadmaps—openness, intelligence, automation, and virtualization remain the core pillars of next-generation RAN platforms—the visibility and adoption of these technologies vary significantly. In the early phase of 5G, Open RAN and vRAN dominated the conversation. Today, AI RAN is the shiny object.

Events such as MWC2026 Barcelona and Nvidia GTC reinforced the message we have communicated for some time, namely that AI RAN is already happening. At the same time, the GPU conversation is shifting. Looking ahead, AI RAN is expected to see broad adoption across the RAN in the latter half of the 5G cycle and from the outset of 6G.

All roads lead to increased adoption of AI RAN. Differences will emerge across deployment models, compute architectures, hardware choices, functional splits, and underlying technologies.

At present, the majority of the AI RAN market is driven by distributed AI-for-RAN solutions focused on improving performance and efficiency, often leveraging existing 5G infrastructure. Vendors such as Huawei and ZTE have collectively shipped more than 0.6 M AI-enabled boards/plug-ins, underscoring that AI RAN is already happening at scale.

One of the key takeaways from MWC Barcelona is that nearly all RAN roadmaps—across both large and smaller vendors—now incorporate AI RAN capabilities across the full RAN stack, with a focus on AI-for-RAN. And it is not just the baseband—suppliers are now bringing intelligence into every RAN layer, including the radios. Ericsson’s launch of ten AI-ready radios featuring in-house silicon with neural network accelerators is a case in point. The question is no longer if AI RAN and AI-RAN will happen, but rather how, what, where, and when.

Dell’Oro’s long-term view of next-generation RAN has remained broadly intact. Events like MWC 2026 and NVIDIA GTC have done little to alter the underlying trajectory. The likelihood that AI RAN, Cloud RAN, and multi-vendor RAN will play major roles in the second half of 5G and the early 6G era remains high, moderate, and low, respectively. According to our latest forecast update, AI RAN is expected to surpass $10 B and account for roughly one-third of the total RAN market by 2029 (this is not new revenue).

Within the AI RAN domain, the prospects for GPU-RAN (and AI-and-RAN) are improving—still small, but no longer negligible. This shift reflects both low starting expectations and a gradual change in sentiment. The conversation is moving from outright skepticism to cautious curiosity. Much of this momentum is being driven by NVIDIA’s continued push and its vision that the world’s ~10 million macro sites could evolve into more than just base stations. As Jensen Huang put it during his GTC keynote: “That base station…is going to become an AI infrastructure platform.”

Early operator progress—from T-Mobile, SoftBank, and Indosat—combined with Nokia’s recent reiteration of its AI-RAN roadmap, is reinforcing this shift. Samsung and 1Finity, meanwhile, are exploring whether GPUs could make sense to diversify their computing platforms.

Part of the renewed interest in AI RAN—and GPU RAN specifically—stems from a broader realization: technological change is accelerating at a much faster pace than during the 4G-to-5G transition. This shift is reshaping how the industry views the role of mobile networks, the distribution of AI inference, and the trade-offs between hardware-based and software-defined architectures.

At the same time, “physical AI” is becoming more tangible. Concepts that once felt like science fiction—such as robots assisting with cooking or walking children to school—are now increasingly plausible in the near term.

That said, operators remain cautious for now about GPU RAN and broad-base AI inference distribution, even as skepticism gradually eases as the ecosystem matures. The constraints are structural. RAN deployments operate under tight power budgets, strict cost controls, and massive scale requirements. These factors make it challenging to justify deploying power-intensive compute at every cell site.

So, concerns persist about the performance-per-watt gap between GPUs and custom silicon, as well as the practicality and need to support non-telco workloads at both D-RAN and C-RAN sites—particularly in D-RAN deployments. For example, the SoftBank/Ericsson robot assistance demo at MWC operated with latency requirements of around 100 ms, which allows for centralized AI inference, with compute resources located in a data center using the User Plane Function.

In other words, AI RAN is moving from hype toward reality. While trade-offs across AI inference distribution needs, flexibility, performance, energy efficiency, TCO, and TTM will shape adoption paths over the near-term and long-term, the overall direction is clear: AI will become an integral part of every layer of the RAN.

Base-case projections suggest that non-GPU RAN will dominate AI RAN over the forecast period, reflecting both the ability to upgrade existing infrastructure, the constraints at the cell site, and the need for multi-purpose tenancy. This suggests NVIDIA still faces a meaningful challenge if it aims to position itself not only as the “inference king,” but also as the “AI RAN king.”

At the same time, the conversation is clearly evolving. Operators are no longer asking why GPUs might be relevant, but rather where and when they make sense. If NVIDIA succeeds in expanding the role of the RAN—from a single-purpose connectivity layer into a distributed AI platform—the long-term opportunity could be significantly larger than what is currently reflected in our base-case assumptions. As Amara’s Law suggests, the risk may not be overestimating the short-term impact of AI RAN, but underestimating the demand for more distributed intelligence over the long-term.

Open RAN has made significant progress since the O-RAN Alliance was formed in 2018 to “re-shape the RAN industry and ecosystem towards more intelligent, open, virtualized, and interoperable networks.” However, the results to date have been mixed. Open fronthaul (Open FH) is increasingly being specified as a baseline capability for next-generation RAN platforms. At the same time, supplier diversity has not improved. In fact, RAN market concentration is higher today than it was before the alliance was established. Also, uneven adoption across greenfield, early-adopting, and early-majority operators contributed to a sharp capex deceleration following the Open RAN peak in 2022. That slowdown fueled concerns about the movement’s momentum, even with single-vendor Open RAN.

Market conditions improved in 2025. Following the roughly 40 percent decline between 2022 and 2024, preliminary findings suggest worldwide Open RAN revenue grew at a double-digit rate in 2025. Virtualized RAN (vRAN) revenue also stabilized, although at a more modest pace. Several factors help explain this reversal, including easier year-over-year comparisons, more favorable RAN spending trends in regions with strong Open RAN exposure, and, to a lesser extent, increased activity among early-majority adopters.

Vendor rankings did not change significantly, but the broader RAN landscape evolved in ways that also affected the Open RAN and Cloud RAN ecosystems. Both Mavenir and NEC revised their RAN strategies. Mavenir is now focusing more on small cells and non-terrestrial networks (NTN), while NEC is prioritizing vRAN and Massive MIMO. Meanwhile, 1Finity moved up one spot in the Open RAN ranking.

The incumbent Western suppliers are fully hedged. Ericsson and Nokia continue to support Open RAN while maintaining integrated portfolios. According to Ericsson’s latest update, 160 radio models will be Open-RAN-proven by the end of 2026. Likewise, Nokia’s recently introduced AI-RAN-ready Doksuri radios include compatibility with Open fronthaul standards.

Looking ahead, the positive momentum is expected to continue into 2026, with both Open RAN and vRAN projected to grow this year. The longer-term outlook for Open RAN and Cloud RAN also remains favorable. We have not changed the long-term assumptions communicated in the most recent forecast update. To recap, near-term Open RAN revenue projections were revised downward, while long-term growth expectations strengthened.

Virtualization remains a key pillar of next-generation RAN platforms. At the same time, Cloud RAN projections were lowered in the most recent five-year forecast. Still, Cloud RAN is expected to account for roughly 15 to 20 percent of the total RAN market by 2030.

Although the narrative around Open RAN improving supplier diversity has clearly cooled, the emerging GPU-RAN and software RAN wave is reopening the conversation about non-traditional suppliers playing a larger role in the RAN ecosystem. That said, the base case outlook for mixing and matching vendors remains limited. Multi-vendor RAN is still expected to account for less than 5 percent of total RAN deployments by 2030.

For more information about our RAN and Open RAN coverage, please see https://www.delloro.com/advanced-research-report/openran/

Following the 14% revenue decline between 2022 and 2024, telecom equipment investment conditions improved in 2025. Preliminary findings indicate that aggregate worldwide telecom equipment revenues across the six programs tracked by Dell’Oro Group—Broadband Access, Microwave & Optical Transport, Mobile Core Network (MCN), Radio Access Network (RAN), and Service Provider Router & Switch—increased 4% year over year (Y/Y) in 2025, supported by an exceptionally strong fourth quarter (accounting for 29% of full-year revenue).

Improved market conditions were supported by easier year-over-year comparisons, inventory stabilization, favorable currency movements, healthy demand for both wireless and wireline equipment, and robust investment from cloud providers, which contributed meaningfully to the overall growth of the telecom equipment market.

From a regional perspective, double-digit growth in North America and EMEA (Europe plus the Middle East and Africa) more than offset the more challenging conditions in the Asia Pacific. North America and China together accounted for slightly more than half of the overall market in 2025.

While growth was supported by both wireless and wireline segments, Optical Transport and SP Router & Switch stood out, partly reflecting their exposure to data center infrastructure investments.

Relative to our expectations heading into 2025, market performance was slightly stronger than the flat outlook initially outlined, supported by better-than-expected growth in MCN, Optical Transport, and SP Routers. Per the MCN report, the 5G MCN market reached an inflection point in 2025.

Global supplier rankings remained largely unchanged, although revenue shares shifted modestly. Nokia gained share, while Huawei and Ericsson remained broadly stable. Nokia’s share gains were partly driven by its acquisition of Infinera.

Regional dynamics vary significantly. Excluding China, the revenue distribution among the top three suppliers is more balanced. In contrast, excluding North America, Huawei’s overall revenue share reached a new high of 41% in 2025.

We attribute Huawei’s strong performance in markets where it is permitted to compete to three key factors:

First, a comprehensive telco strategy, with Huawei ranking as the #1 supplier by revenue across all six telco programs.
Second, technology leadership, supported by R&D investments that continue to exceed those of its competitors.
Third, footprint expansion, as Huawei has adapted to geopolitical constraints limiting its total TAM by focusing on share gains in markets where it can operate.

Looking ahead, the analyst team expects the positive momentum to extend into 2026. Global telecom equipment revenue across the six programs is projected to grow 2% to 4% in 2026, though the outlook for wireless infrastructure remains more muted.

Contact Us

Cybersecurity Concerns Could Hurt Broadband Providers