[wp_tech_share]

In our 2Q 2025 Mobile Core Network (MCN) and Multi-access Edge Computing Report (MEC), we estimated manufacturing revenues by 5G Core vendors at a 31 percent year-over-year growth rate. At the same time, we announced that 71 Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) have commercially launched enhanced Mobile Broadband (eMBB) services to consumers.

As an industry, we have been bemoaning the slow uptake of 5G SA networks by MNOs. After all, we are in the sixth year of the 5G SA era, and with over 700 MNOs in the world, it is surprising that more 5G SA networks have not launched.

So why the acceleration in the 5G SA core space despite only 10% of the MNOs having launched 5G SA?

First, let’s look at the MNOs that have launched 5G SA eMMB networks for consumers.

The 40 countries/territories, with at least one MNO, can provide service to over 55% of the world’s population. At the same time, only 14% of the world’s mobile subscribers had 5G SA services at the end of 2024 (per Ericsson Mobility Report, June 2025). The conclusion one can draw from this is a low penetration rate of 5G SA subscribers from the 71 MNOs offering 5G SA services. The Chinese MNOs have been very aggressive in building out 5G SA coverage, and China Mobile, as an example, has achieved 60% 5G SA subscriber penetration after their launch in 2020. China Mobile’s 5G SA penetration rate is the best-case scenario for a large Tier-1 MNO. But even so, they still have many subscribers who can migrate from 4G to 5G. As the existing 5G SA networks mature in coverage and new, lower-cost handsets become available, with attractive incentives by MNOs to upgrade to 5G SA handsets, subscriber growth is certainly driving demand for more capacity in the 5G Core.

In addition, many MNOs already offer 5G SA for enterprises and Fixed Wireless Access (FWA), but have not yet opened the 5G SA network to consumers; however, they are expected to do so soon. They include Bharti Airtel in India, 3 in Ireland, Sunrise in Switzerland, and AT&T and Verizon in the US.

Other MNOs have announced plans to launch 5G SA, but without specific timelines, including Bouygues Telecom, O2 Telefónica, and SFR in France, Bharti Airtel in India, MTN in Nigeria and South Africa, Rakuten in Japan, and Vodacom in South Africa, which will drive future growth. As a result, we project the 5G MCN revenue will grow at a 6% CAGR from 2024 to 2029.

Other factors impacting growth include:
  • NR Reduced Capability (RedCap): RedCap-enabled IoT will bring more 5G devices to market at a lower cost point with better performance, like new 5G smartwatches expected to be introduced in the fall. AT&T has announced nationwide RedCap coverage, maybe in anticipation of a new 5G smartwatch by Apple. Rumors of 5G smartwatches with RedCap coming this fall and winter are rampant for all smartwatch suppliers. These new smartwatches will require more capacity for the 5G Core. Even if these rumors do not materialize in this upgrade cycle, AT&T can offer more 5G SA services to enterprises using new IoT devices with RedCap.
  • 5G MEC: One example of Public MEC is Telefónica Spain, which is in the process of implementing 17 MEC nodes, delivering a latency of 10 ms to MEC subscribers by the end of 2025. Private MEC nodes are numerous (on-premises) with over 55,000 in China. The China market penetration rate is approximately 25% of enterprises, and Chinese MNOs are planning to address the next 25% of enterprises over the next several years. Also, Dynamic network slicing is maturing, and MNOs, such as Orange in Europe, are promoting these capabilities in their 5G SA markets.
  • Voice over NR (VoNR): As 5G SA continues to mature, MNOs are beginning to leverage more of the capability that 5G SA offers, for example: VoNR with cloud-native IMS Core is bringing immersive calling experiences to the user, driving Voice Core and 5G Packet Core growth. MNOs such as AT&T and Boost Mobile in the US, O2 Telefónica in Germany, and 2degrees in New Zealand are in the process of upgrading their Voice Core networks to IMS Core cloud-native network functions.
  • Impact of AI: Theoretically, Agentic AI apps can be connected to the network 24/7, which could significantly impact network performance, driving the demand for more packet core and voice core capacity. Examples of agentic AI are emerging as mobile network operators (MNOs) begin offering premium versions of advanced AI search tools to their customers. For instance, Bell in Canada and SoftBank in Japan have partnered with Perplexity to attract new customers to their networks. Additionally, a growing number of existing customers are utilizing AI independently.
  • Public Cloud: Another trend we are monitoring is the re-emergence of the option to put the 5G Core workloads in a Public Cloud. Public Cloud vendors are returning to the market with better solutions than several years ago, when we were in the hype phase about moving 5G workloads to the Public Cloud. MNOs can now evaluate which is the best approach for their market, build a 5G Telco Cloud, use the Public Cloud, or go with a Hybrid Cloud strategy.

Increasing 5G subscriber growth, additional 5G SA buildouts, more devices via RedCap, better performance via MEC with dynamic network slicing attracting new customers, greater use of Agentic AI, and more use of the Public Cloud are behind the driving growth for 5G SA networks.

[wp_tech_share]

Open RAN has made significant progress since the O-RAN Alliance was formed in 2018 to “reshape the RAN industry and ecosystem towards more intelligent, open, virtualized, and interoperable networks”. But the results have been mixed so far.

Cumulative Open RAN revenues are approaching $10 billion, the Open Fronthaul (OFH) interface has become an increasingly important requirement, and most leading operators now regard O-RAN, Cloud RAN, and AI-driven RAN as core pillars of their next-generation RAN roadmaps. However, multi-vendor RAN adoption and expectations remain limited. According to the latest 1H25 RAN report, market concentration—as measured by the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI)—is rising across several regions. The RAN market is now classified as “highly concentrated” (HHI > 2500) in five of the six tracked regions. This suggests that the supplier diversity element of the Open RAN vision is fading.

Market traction has also proven uneven. Open RAN initially scaled rapidly, fueled by large-scale deployments in Japan and the U.S. However, after this sharp rise, total Open RAN revenues declined by roughly 40% within two years, as activity outside early adopters failed to offset the slowdown in the U.S. and Japan. While some moderation was expected, the pace of deceleration was sharper than anticipated, in part because of weaker 5G investments overall.

Open RAN is beginning to show signs of stabilization. Preliminary data indicate that Open RAN revenues grew year-over-year (Y/Y) in 2Q25 and were nearly flat Y/Y in the first half, supported by easier comparisons, stronger capex tied to existing Open RAN deployments, and increased activity among early majority adopters.

Our long-term view has remained largely consistent since we began tracking the market in 2019. Long-term Open RAN growth prospects remain favorable. Although near-term headwinds and business case challenges persist, the broader trajectory continues to point toward greater openness, virtualization, intelligence, and automation across the RAN. We remain optimistic about the outlook for Open RAN and Cloud RAN in the latter part of the forecast period, though the attractiveness of the multi-vendor RAN model continues to be limited.

Additional highlights from the 2Q25 RAN report and August 2025 Open RAN 5-year forecast include:

  • The top 3 Virtualized RAN suppliers based on worldwide revenue (2Q25, 4-Quarter Trailing) are Samsung, Rakuten Symphony, and 1Finity (formerly Fujitsu).
  • Virtualized RAN revenue is expected to grow in 2025.
  • Multi-vendor RAN is projected to reach $2 billion to $3 billion by 2029.

For more information about our RAN and Open RAN coverage, please visit https://www.delloro.com/advanced-research-report/openran/

[wp_tech_share]

The U.S. broadband and mobile market is rapidly evolving, with fixed wireless access (FWA) and MVNO-based mobile plans reshaping competition. Cable operators, once dominant over DSL and limited fiber, are now under pressure from FWA—already serving 13 million users—and expanding FTTH deployments. Despite broadband subscriber losses, major players like Comcast and Charter are seeing strong mobile subscriber growth, helping offset the decline. To stay competitive, operators are adopting aggressive strategies like multi-year price locks, device buyouts, and simplified DIY installations to encourage bundling and reduce churn.

In this insightful article, exclusive contribution to CSI Magazine Broadband Special Edition, Summer 2025, VP Broadband Analyst Jeff Heynen breaks down how convergence and bundling are becoming essential survival strategies.

From multi-play packages and mobile subscriber gains to DOCSIS 4.0 innovations and edge virtualization, Heynen outlines the new architecture shaping the future of cable. Whether you’re an operator, vendor, or strategist, this piece provides a clear view of where the market is headed—and what it takes to stay ahead.

Download the article directly from CSI Magazine’s Summer 2025 digital edition for full analysis:

Key Topics Covered:

  • The impact of mobile subscriber growth on broadband strategy
  • How cable is leveraging Wi-Fi, CBRS, and GAP nodes
  • The role of vCMTS, vBNG, and 5G AGF in future convergence
  • Enhancing customer experience with Wi-Fi 7 and low-latency DOCSIS
  • Cost-effective capacity expansion versus FTTH buildouts

Don’t miss this expert perspective on how cable operators can future-proof their networks in a rapidly converging world!

[wp_tech_share]

…but a lot has changed since 2023

It has been a long slog, but on June 27th HPE finally received the go ahead to acquire Juniper, avoiding what could have been a protracted court battle in the US.  By granting two limited concessions, HPE will now be able to absorb its smaller rival, in a bid to take on Cisco.

HPE’s intention to acquire Juniper for $40/share was announced a year and a half ago, but first CEO-level discussions related to a potential transaction occurred much before that, in February 2023.  The engagement has been a long one, stretched out due to an executive change, price negotiations, regulatory hurdles, and the late intervention by the US Department of Justice.  Meanwhile, a lot has changed in the IT equipment market.

Negotiations on a Roller Coaster

The last two years have been marked by pandemic shock waves and AI hype.   When HPE’s CEO, Antonio Neri, first contacted Juniper about a potential transaction, the IT equipment market was showing signs of recovery after supply-challenged 2022. ChatGPT had launched just three months earlier, and the world was awestruck by its vast potential.  Juniper’s early investments in an AI-driven architecture seemed prescient.

During the acquisition negotiations, the IT market skyrocketed, fueled by backlog fulfillment. However, by the end of 2023, the market was awash with excess inventory, and Juniper’s 4Q23 revenue expectations fell below the outlook executives shared with HPE in October. Fast forward a year, and Juniper’s 2024 revenues were 12% below the figure they had predicted during the negotiations.

Meanwhile, the AI landscape has also shifted.

The focused use of AI to automate network operations is becoming a mainstay for equipment vendors, narrowing Juniper’s lead in AIOps mindshare. Since Neri began negotiating with Juniper, CommScpope has introduced RUCKUS One, Extreme has begun taking beta customers on Platform ONE, and Cisco announced AI Canvas – all with AI-fueled features that compete with Juniper’s Mist.

Meanwhile, in a backdrop of economic uncertainty driven by global trade tensions, the broader use of AI may divert enterprise budgets over the next few years.  To implement AI workloads in earnest, enterprises will need to spend on compute, AI models, applications and renewed cybersecurity, which could depress sales of networking equipment.

Where the Rubber Hits the Road

Now that the transaction is final, Juniper’s CEO Rami Rahim will take over HPE’s new networking division, consolidating Juniper’s business with HPE’s Intelligent Edge. Over half of Juniper’s sales are to enterprise customers, and this segment of the business will be fraught with drama.

Until now, HPE’s Aruba products have competed head-to-head with Juniper Mist, and customers are concerned about the implications this acquisition will have on product roadmaps. The overlap is the highest in the WLAN and Campus Switch portfolios.  While Juniper has the innovative microservices architecture, HPE has the higher market share, the closest competitor to networking behemoth Cisco.

Forces to Shape the Outcome

The concessions that HPE made in order to avoid a lawsuit from the U.S. Department of Justice are unlikely to present a large hurdle to the success of the acquisition.  HPE is required to divest its Instant On business, which was designed for the SMB (Small Medium Business) segment and makes up a small percentage of HPE’s revenue.   The combined HPE/Juniper entity is also required to auction two licenses to the WLAN Mist AIOps source code, while maintaining full ownership of the code for their own use. This may present an interesting opportunity for two American companies, but it is only a small piece of a successful enterprise IT strategy.  The formula for competing with Cisco must involve a complete networking portfolio of hardware and software, along with a well-developed channel.  A license to Mist source code can only go so far.

The real hurdles to this acquisition are deeper and more difficult to solve.  Rami Rahim’s top priorities will include rationalizing road maps, obtaining the promised $450 Million in G&A (General and Administrative expense) savings, and incentivizing the sales teams and channel to toe the line.  While navigating complex technological and organizational optimizations, HPE’s new networking division will have to face the following market forces:

  1. Enterprises have “IT inertia”

In a worst-case combination, HPE could shut down the HPE or Juniper product lines with the smallest market share in each overlapping area. If every one of these customers got angry and changed to another vendor HPE-Juniper would lose about a quarter of its enterprise sales.

However, changing vendors is not something enterprises like to do.  They have trained their staff, developed custom tools, and come to appreciate the features of their existing equipment.  With the right positioning, HPE can embark on a slow product integration of Aruba Central and Mist, giving customers the best of both worlds and allowing a smooth transition.

  1. Entrenchment of Goliath

Neri wants to challenge the market leader Cisco, but he will have to do more than incorporate Juniper’s enterprise revenues to become number one.

Networking vendors saw a glimmer of hope when, with the acquisition of Splunk, Cisco seemed set to leave its networking heritage behind to focus on AI, cloud and cyber security. However at Cisco Live in June, CEO Chuck Robbins appeared alongside Chief Product Officer Jeetu Patel with a message that the company may be pivoting to AI, but that networking was remaining at the core of Cisco’s strategy. (https://www.delloro.com/cisco-live-2025-networking-reappears-at-the-center-of-ciscos-ai-strategy/).

Cisco captures over a third of all enterprise market revenues.  HPE and Juniper combined make up 8%. The plan to become number one will be a long-term project and will involve fighting IT inertia with a powerful product offering exuding simplicity and providing a lower-cost option to Cisco customers.

  1. Security is another world

Security is a critical and rapidly growing priority for enterprises. With its acquisition of Juniper, HPE has entered the firewall market, creating opportunities to expand its sales and bolster its emerging SSE (Secure Service Edge) revenue.

However, the combined entity remains significantly behind established network security leaders like Palo Alto Networks and Fortinet, holding low single-digit market share in the SSE and firewall segments. It is worth noting that network security is one of the few segments that Cisco does not lead, and conversely, neither Palo Alto Networks nor Fortinet are among the leaders in other enterprise networking categories. HPE, as a traditional networking vendor, will face unique challenges in penetrating the network security market.

  1. Culture is a Killer

The Harvard Business Review estimates that the majority of acquisitions fail to generate value due to hubris, social factors and a lack of understanding of the strengths that made the acquisition target a success.  Both the Mist and Aruba brands have a strong recognition in IT circles, and bring different values to Juniper and HPE, leading to an acquisition with high potential for infighting, misunderstanding, and false assumptions.

It’s Theirs to Lose

Since acquiring Mist in 2018, Juniper has demonstrated the potential to take this cloud-managed, AI-driven architecture to the big leagues.  While HPE Aruba’s premises-based enterprise portfolio has a dominant position, its cloud-managed solution has languished.  Acquisition failure would represent a huge opportunity lost for Juniper and would cut HPE out of margin-rich recurring software streams that come with cloud-managed sales.

Meanwhile, established vendors such as Ubiquiti, Huawei, CommScope and Extreme are ready to take advantage of market confusion.  In addition, startups with innovative technology and business structures are betting that enterprises frustrated with incumbents are keen to try something new.  If HPE bungles this acquisition, there will be no shortage of competitors ready to pounce.

HPE’s established extensive channel and installed base, merged with Juniper’s Mist AIOps engine, could be the combination that gives Cisco a run for its money. Market digestion and a shift in AI spending may be mere bumps in the road.  In the end, hubris, blind spots and brand culture could be the biggest risks of all.

[wp_tech_share]

We recently attended the Telco AI Forum hosted by RCR Wireless. It was an excellent event, touching on many AI Telco topics. Some of the key takeaways related to AI RAN include:

  • Near-term focus on AI-for-RAN
  • Monetization is part of the long-term vision
  • Transition will be gradual
  • AI from day 1 with 6G

AI in the RAN has been around for decades. But the focus is shifting. Operators now focus on AI-for-RAN, meaning opex, performance, and efficiency improvements. In addition to the role AI can play in the automation journey and with energy savings, operators are increasingly looking at how to squeeze more out of the existing spectrum by using AI for channel estimation, MIMO, CA, and beamforming, among other things. Michael Irizarry, CTO of US Cellular, mentioned they are seeing 10% to 15% of potential efficiency gains in the network.

Monetization is part of the long-term vision. Not surprisingly and consistent with what we discussed in a recent AI RAN blog post, “AI RAN Should We be Excited“, there is strong consensus that AI RAN can improve the user experience, enhance performance, spur efficiency gains, reduce power consumption, and play a critical role in the broader automation journey. However, there is greater skepticism about AI’s ability to turn the RAN sites into profit engines. While many still buy into this concept of improving the overall site utilization by using the workloads for both RAN and AI, the key change over the past year is simply the realization that the GPU business case needs to be justified in the “RAN only” scenario. AI-and-RAN or multi-tenant RAN can improve the ROI, but it should not be a requirement to justify the investment.

The transition from RAN to AI RAN will be an evolution steered by the business case. Rob Hughes, head of wireless marketing at Fujitsu, envisions an approach similar to that of 5G SA. In some cases, the operators start small and go after specific pockets before expanding more broadly.  Michael Irizarry with US Cellular believes rip & replace is unlikely. “The competitive nature of this Industry puts a lot of pressure on the margins, and the ROI will guide the investment cycle”. As the natural cycle ends, operators can assess their best options. Guy Turgeon, Senior Principal Industry Specialist at Red Hat, envisions that the operators that have already started the journey by moving to a cloud native architecture leveraging COTS HW might be in a better position from a readiness and skillset perspective. At the same time, there is no question that the asymmetric starting point between appliance-based RAN and COTS HW will impact the transition, and custom HW will likely comprise a significant share of the 5G AI-for-RAN market. The AI-RAN Alliance discussed the hybrid CPU/GPU roadmap.

AI RAN will be a reality from the start with 6G. While 6G does not change the existing site grid dynamics and the splits between C-RAN and D-RAN, the expectation is that AI will be a focus from the start with 6G. Since the base case scenario is that the “anchor” band for 6G will be in the upper 6 GHz+ range and the business case is hinging on carriers’ ability to leverage the existing macro grid, the expectation is that AI is needed for RAN optimization and in the MAC layer for scheduling, beam management, and MIMO optimization. Ofir Zemer, Vice President, Product Management at Qualcomm and responsible for its RAN Automation suite, believes a powerful agentic layer is essential for Level 3+ automation to manage the increased complexity in the networks (According to the TM Forum, the average operator is currently at Autonomous Networks Level 2, Level 3+ is expected by the time 6G comes around).

For more info, please visit the RCR Wireless Telco AI Forum site to watch the webinar on-demand.